Compare BEML BD65 vs BOBCAT B900
Compare beml bd65 vs bobcat b900
![https://res.cloudinary.com/dz4x78ghb/image/fetch/c_scale,q_30,w_300,f_auto/https://www.trucksbuses.com/uploads/34617_1f148b8f107f4bb09007a77fa30df150beml_bd65.jpg]()
BEML BD65
![https://res.cloudinary.com/dz4x78ghb/image/fetch/c_scale,q_30,w_300,f_auto/https://www.trucksbuses.com/uploads/34597_83ba4b6aafb64436b7c83426b7b5d4d9bobcat-b900.png]()
BOBCAT B900
Overviewof
| Max Operating Weight |
18320 Kg |
7990 Kg |
|
| Engine |
Water cooled turbo charged |
H4C47422 |
|
| Power |
165 HP |
74 HP@2200 rpm |
|
| Torque Max |
765 Nm |
336 Nm@1400 rpm |
|
| Lift Capacity of Bucket at Full Reach |
N/A |
1685 Kg |
|
Engine & Performanceof
| Transmission |
N/A |
Carraro / Synchro Shuttle |
|
| Engine Displacement |
N/A |
3839 cc |
|
| Emission Norm Compliance |
N/A |
BS4 |
|
| Electricals Battery |
2 x 12V, 200Ah |
12V, 130 Ah 90A |
|
| Bucket Tear Out Force |
N/A |
6121 Kgf |
|
| Dipper Tear Out Force |
N/A |
3072 Kgf |
|
| Cooling System |
N/A |
Water cooled |
|
Design & Configurationof
| Front Axle |
N/A |
Steer axle, centrally pivoted with oscillation angle 16 |
|
| Rear Axle |
N/A |
Rigidly mounted rear axle with outbound planetary drives |
|
| Tyres |
N/A |
Front: 9 x 16
Rear: 16.9 x 28 |
|
| Bucket Roll Back Angle at Maximum Hinge Pin Height |
N/A |
64 Deg |
|
| Hinge Pin Height |
N/A |
3514 mm |
|
Features & Comfortof
| Steering Type |
N/A |
Front Wheel Steering |
|
| Instrument cluster |
Digital with analog dials |
Digital with analog dials |
|
Safetyof
| Service Brakes |
N/A |
Hydraulic wet multi disc, dual pedal braking |
|
| Parking Brakes |
N/A |
Mechanical control on rear axle |
|
| Reverse Parking Buzzer |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Key Comparison of BEML BD65 vs BOBCAT B900